I.T. Discussion Community!
-Collapse +Expand
Message Boards
Tech Search:

-Collapse +Expand More Board Options
-Collapse +Expand My Moderator Settings

Posts: 15715
Threads: 4639
Topics: 95
Boards: 34
Groups: 34

Prestwood eMagazine

August Edition
Subscribe now! It's Free!
Enter your email:

   ► MB Lobby ►   Print This     

Scott Wehrley Posts

"Scott Wehrley" Message Board Posts

Thread 1 of 1

Scott Wehrley & feasibility
I am a little unclear on some of the points made in Scott's Feasibility Revisitted in the newsletter, the first being where he talks about paths & checkpoints. He says that an informal feasibility can be delivered verbally or via e-mail. Prior to that Scott said that when a feasibility study is delivered to a customer, it serves as a documented understanding of the project scope and needs. Yet, an informal feasibility study can be delivered verbally. , , Elsewhere, Scott says that after the customer has had a chance to review the feasibility study, he has an opportunity to say No to the project, reduce functionality, scope, etc. Does this infer that cost of project can be determined at this juncture well enough to give a customer a quote so he can make decisions?, , Finally, in robust, is the requirments phase already accomplished when the feasibility is delivered?, , thanks
Posted to MB Topic: PSDP « Proj Man Board
13 years ago
2 replies. Last post:

thanks scott - , , Even with small projects, it's amazing how things can be misinterpreted and create far more trouble than the project is literally worth. I assume that you have the customer sign an agreement and in the agreement it is stated what specific work will be performed. This would then be your documentation., , By the way, I truly appreciated your article. It actually was a good interface to what I've read so far of PSDP.
13 years ago
Nothing New Since Your Last Visit

Follow PrestwoodBoards on: 

©1995-2020 PrestwoodBoards  [Security & Privacy]
Professional IT Services: Coding | Websites | Computer Tech